IFPI reports that 95% of Music downloads are illegal, industry loses £180 m

Posted in News by Generator on Wednesday 11th of February 2009

Even linking to this website would be illegal

 

A recent report by the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI) has revealed that an estimated 95% of all music downloaded are illegal.

 

The figures from 2008 show that 40bn music files were illegally shared in 16 countries, presenting further sobering news to the recorded music industry and demonstrating that despite the expanding popularity of download sites such as I-Tunes, most music downloaded equates with no revenue going to record label or artist.

 

The report took responses from a number of consumer surveys over the last three years about downloading habits and compared them with the 2.3bn legitimate online tracks that were sold in 2008.

 

The report goes on to suggest that within the UK market alone, the record industry lost £180m last year, and will stand to lose more than £1bn by 2012 if current habitual consumer trends continue and customers continue to use torrent-sharing sites such as Pirate Bay and Iso Hunt to illegally download tracks and albums.

 

The UK saw the biggest increase in digital sales in the first half of 2008 among the top markets around the world, with sales up by 45%. A total of 110m single tracks were downloaded in 2008, up 42% on the year before. Digital album sales also rose significantly, by 65% to 10.3m, and now account for 7.7% of the albums market.

 

However, the report also found that consumer demand for music is higher than ever, despite a tangible decline in CDs sales last year.

 

For some time now, the key issue for the industry has been how music companies will find effective new business and delivery models to deal with such a dramatic paradigm shift and translate the appetite for new music into viable revenue streams.

 

The IFPI also discovered that paid-for single track down loads now drive the online market, with sales exceeding 1.4bn.
The biggest selling download singles of last year included the songs ‘Sex on Fire’ by Kings of Leon and ‘Mercy’ by Duffy.

 

Concluding the report, the IFPI looks towards newly developed subscription services for digital music as evidence that the industry is adapting to the climate change.

 

Licensing music to third parties is also proving to be mutually beneficial for both the music and blossoming games industry, with the popularity of interactive music games such as Rock Band and Guitar Hero accounting for a staggering 15% of overall industry sales in the first half of 2008.

 

Have your say - Do you legally download tracks and albums? What should the new business model be? Would you like to see more innovative ‘honesty box’ releases such as Radiohead’s ‘In Rainbows’? If so, how many bands are realistically in a position to do that? What are your thoughts on licensing music to third parties such as video games?

Comments

It is difficult to see a need for the "music industry". Artists can now make professional quality recordings for a small investment in equipment. They can put it on a web server for little or no cost. People can download it for nothing or a small donation. What do they need Sony for?

I am a very firm subscriber to the ideas of Andrew Dubber (http://www.newmusicstrategies.com) on this subject. It is his view - and mine - that torrent downloading is not "piracy". Downloading illegal duplicates of digital files does not make money for the people who uploaded it, and should never be compared to selling dodgy DVDs round your local market for commercial gain.

The shift from analogue vinyl & tape to digital mp3s is as great as the shift from sheet music to recorded music when Edison invented the first recording device.
Just as the Printing Press put the educated Scribes out of business, but made it unimaginably simple to distribute collections of writing, the mp3 revolution feeds the consumers' insatiable appetite for interesting music, in quantities they could ever afford to pay for.

As a musician, I would rather sell 0 records, and have 10,000 fans who have downloaded and loved my work, than sell 0 records, and have 0 fans because I tried to charge £15 for my album. It's about time the IFPI woke up and realised their current business model simply WILL NOT WORK in the world of instant accessibility via the internet.

Elliott.

Post new comment

This will not display with your comment.
Save Your Reply Preview Your Reply